Обидно конечно что не напечатают, но не в первой:
The idea of creating "brain-inspired chips" is nonsense. And here's why:
Firstly, Philosophy is a science, as evidenced by the commercial and widespread use of AI platforms. Secondly, Philosophy proposed a way to automatically create relational databases containing reliable-detailed copies of real people, without delving into what their brains at the mechanical level and the functionality how they work. That is, Philosophy transmits texts into language understandable to computer, keeping the human soul into these translations (as biases, BIOSes).
However so called neural networks, which have existed for 70 years, work as a manual translation of the same texts. Manual! These lack human biases, which are the basis of AI! (For example, look at the meaningless texts by OpenAI GPT-3, without the use of biases?)
On the one hand we have Philosophy and real money brought by it, real AI, and regular chips; on the other, non-scientifically grounded neural networks which demand only God knows what and why.
https://forums.theregister.com/forum/1/2022/09/12/brain_chips_interview/?post_received=1
