Автор Тема: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!  (Прочитано 8481 раз)

0 Пользователей и 1 Гость просматривают эту тему.

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #480 : 11 Март 2022, 15:48:25 »
Кстати моя Нумеральная теория первая, которая смогла объяснить что такое «плюс» и «минус» в электричестве и магнетизме. Кроме моего объяснения не существует никакого
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Большой Форум

Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #480 : 11 Март 2022, 15:48:25 »
Загрузка...

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #481 : 14 Апрель 2022, 10:38:26 »
Ну что ж, моё периписывание уравнений Максвелла доказано экспериментом В.Макарова. Моё наследство.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #482 : 14 Апрель 2022, 15:22:53 »
1855, год когда он их сформулировал. И 2021, когда я их переписал на молярные величины. Новая шкала счислений, без употребления величин по договорённости. Таких как расстояние между, энергия и пр.   
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #483 : 15 Июнь 2022, 16:14:52 »
В новых уравнениях Максвелла идёт привязка к числу Авогадро и молярным величинам вместо энергии и пр. При этом признаётся что электро- и магнито- свойства есть следствие изменения молярных параметров. Делается это посредством задействования Внутренних Отношений теория Аналитической Философии, необходимость какового действа следует из существования Стационарного уравнения Шрёдингера, двух- мерной пси- функции вместо трёх- мерной, и Гамильтониан. (В Шрёдингера и Гамильтониан масса частицы стоит в знаменателе, при том что масса фотона в Стандартной Теори равна 0; следовательно признаётся что фотон это материальная точка.)

Таким образом моё восстание против Внешних Отношений теории Аналитической Философии, протв Расселла, Мура и Витгенштейна оправдывается как минимум тремя экспериментами, уравнениями Шрёдингера и Гамильтониан.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #484 : 20 Август 2022, 00:15:27 »
Пожалуйста, плод моего гения:

1) Закон для приращения молярного объема: приращение молярного объема ведет к возникновению силы упругости, проявляющейся как электричество D.
2) Закон для приращения молярной массы: приращение молярной массы ведет к возникновению силы упругости, проявляющейся как магнетизм В.
3) Закон перехода приращения малярной массы в приращение молярного объема: приращение одного ведет к приращению другого Е.
4) Закон перехода приращения молярного объема в приращение молярной массы: приращение одного ведет к приращению другого Н.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #485 : 19 Ноябрь 2022, 14:13:42 »
Цитата: 424543445F4404300 link=1664969270/62#62 date=1668855280
Цитата: 704B514A4B09220 link=1664969270/61#61 date=1668853938
Был третий вариант - поправить и Максвелла и Ньютона.

А есть пример таких предполагаемых исправлений в уравнениях Максвелла, которые не приводили бы к фатальному противоречию их с экспериментом?

Те кто пытался исправить уравнения Максвелла перепробовали вроде все варианты, но чем черт не шутит, может у вас есть непроверенный ими вариант?

Ведь стоит вам что либо поправить в них про сложно проверяемые утверждения про далекие звезды или околосветовые скорости - как то же самое исправление оказывается влияет и на банально взаимодействие провода с магнитом, очень легко проверяемое.

В Количественной теории первый закон Ньютона:
Есть материальная и продолженная материальная точка; первая имеет одно измерение — время; вторая имеет два измерения — протяжённость и время.
Второй закон Ньютона:
Становясь точкой накопления материальная приобретает дефект, те молярную массу и объём.
Третий закон Ньютона:
Точка накопления стремится к ликвидации приобретенного дефекта и становлению материальной точкой.
Так что законы Ньютона это интегральная часть Количественной и, соответсвенно, продолжения ТО Эйнштейна.

Постулат I: В данном объеме находится только такое количество минимальных частей мироздания.

Постулат II: Время включения минимальной частицы мироздания в любое множестов минимально возможное.

И все выводится из единственной в Физике Аксиомы:
— Есть одна, две, три и более минимальных частей любого тела.

Переписанные на молярные величины уравнения Максвелла:

1) Закон для приращения молярного объема: приращение молярного объема ведет к возникновению силы упругости, проявляющейся как электричество D.
2) Закон для приращения молярной массы: приращение молярной массы ведет к возникновению силы упругости, проявляющейся как магнетизм В.
3) Закон перехода приращения малярной массы в приращение молярного объема: приращение одного ведет к приращению другого Е.
4) Закон перехода приращения молярного объема в приращение молярной массы: приращение одного ведет к приращению другого Н.

И всё доказано двущелевым, квантовой запутанности и «тока смещения» опытами. Никаких математических трюков, есть эксперименты.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #486 : 02 Сентябрь 2023, 03:30:42 »
Постоянная Планка просто не имеет никакого места в Продолжении ТО Эйнштейна: нет в нём никакой волновой функции! Как нет места и Квантовой механике! Вздор эта самая Квантовая механика…
В Продолжении есть только Классическая.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #487 : 02 Сентябрь 2023, 05:53:33 »
Квантовую физику нужно выбрасывать нафик, чему основание квантовой запутанности опыт. Этот опыт убедительно доказывает что тела это точки накопления. Плюс двущелевой и тока смещения доказывают то же самое.
Такие вот дела.
После выброса квантовой физики и механики идёт возврат к классической физике, к переписанным на точки накопления законам Ньютона, Кулона и Ампера.
Всё, нет больше волновой функции, уравнений Шрёдингера и пр ахинеи.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #488 : 02 Сентябрь 2023, 06:08:09 »
Сам не ожидал. Но так получается что я похоронил Квантовую Физику, а вместе с ней практически все современные физические теории.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #489 : 03 Сентябрь 2023, 00:46:26 »
Всё. Осталось доработать малёха и можно посылать в журнал
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #490 : 05 Сентябрь 2023, 22:00:28 »
Continuation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity 

Abstract.
Accumulation points are introduced to Physics. Based on these points a Continuation of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity was written, the Law of Nature was derived based on Poincaré’s Reccurence Theorem adoptee for the above mentioned points, formula for the Law formulated using Newton's for gravity, Coulomb and Ampere laws, which were transformed, three Newton's laws and Maxwell's equations were reformatted as well for them.

Introduction.
The material point has been used for centuries to solve almost all problems of Physics. For example, to find the parameters of a bicycle, which moves from point A to point B, to analyze the trajectory of a ball thrown up, to simulate the behavior of particles in an accelerator, to find the trajectories of comets, etc. However, it was found that there are multiple kinds of points, only for material were discovered two, plus one for the accumulation points, which are presented in the article. There are probably many other kinds of points, which then thought allows us to see the world around us, our universe differently.

The Continuation of Einstein's Theory of Relativity is based upon the concept of the accumulation point, which is first introduced in this article; where the point substitutes a physical object, has molar mass and volume, is unique (there is no other like it), has two parts (elements), and its analysis is possible only for what happens with these two. 
At the same time, the theory rejects the traditional, centuries-old use of non-unique and multiple material points, while their sizes, shapes, and internal structures are ignored.
Existence.
Only what, in many experiments, under approximately similar conditions, provides the same result, exists. 
Material points do not participate and cannot be in any experiment, because it can only be conducted in the world of accumulation points, with molar characteristics present, which ones material points lack.
Accumulation Point.
Traditionally, the following definition is given, in the Theory of Sets, for an "accumulation point": a point x of a topological space X as part of the space M, any neighborhood of which contains infinitely many points of the space M (reference to the dictionary). This the mathematical is modified: point x has molar mass and volume (“space X") and contains the entire Universe ("space M”). 
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #491 : 05 Сентябрь 2023, 22:02:16 »
Space. 
Space is the molar volume, in this theory, like the orisphere in the spirit of Lobachevsky's geometry; where the orisphere is a sphere with an infinitely increasing radius, which makes the molar volume of the orisphere equal to the entire Universe.
There are numerous, well-tested and well-established experiments proving the existence of such the orisphere: 
1. The quantum entanglement experiment, when a change in one photon is reflected in a change in another, wherever it is, and where the states of the two are interdependent: one photon is literally the entire universe. 
2. Or displacement current, when the current in the capacitor exists despite the open circuit: the changes in the orisphere of the atom, in one plate of the capacitor, leads to a change and the appearance of a current in the atom of the other side, behind a break in the circuit. That is, the occurrence of a displacement current can be seen even at the other end of the Universe, trillions of trillions of light years away, which proves that any accumulation point is all the Universe. 
3. Or the double-slit experiment, when the interference pattern appears on the screen only when the width of the slits approaches the size, due to the ratio of the molar mass to the molar volume for the atom of the slit’s wall. Indeed, if the width of the slots is increased, then the illumination of the screen will increase, but the severity of the minima and maxima of the interference pattern will gradually fall, until it disappears completely. From this experiment follows that the orisphere of an atom is larger than its molar volume.
The double-slit proves that being affected by light (Einstein's photoelectric effect), atoms receive a defect (as increments of their molar characteristics), which leads to the appearance of an interaction force in the striving to place the right number of elements into the slit’s atoms: each the atom captures a photon flying past attempring to decrease or eliminate its defect. The photon is included, for example, into an atom’s electron, which followed by the emission of a coherent photon to preserve and maintain the required number of photons.  
Since the electron has a spin, the emission does not occur immediately but with a time delay, which is seen as interference fringes.
The double-slit proves that any accumulation point is all the Universe. 
Quantum physics. 
Quantum physics is erroneous, since the above experiments unequivocally indicate the impossibility of ignoring molar volumes, working with material points only. 
Relativity.
Since the point is the only one, there is no question of any relativity in the Continuation.
Coordinate system. 
In the Continuation, there is only one and only the coordinate system, called Egocentric (link to my article), since only one object or subject is considered: the number of photons and time are the only which are taken into account. Everything else that exists is represented through the constant in the formula for the law for the interaction.
Material point. 
Photon doesn’t exist among accumulation points, therefore there is a dualism, which was not taken into account by Russell-Zermelo into the so-called Russell Paradox.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #492 : 05 Сентябрь 2023, 22:03:01 »
String theory.
The given here theory accepts, modifying to suit its needs, the well known without farther references, the foundational idea of String Theory that photons, known as strings, have a predicate (from the late Latin praedicatum (said), indicating the property that separates an object): it is very likely that we are talking about one- or two- dimensional space.
Uniqueness. 
Only photons are indistinguishable from each other, since they do not have molar mass as a second predicate, where two predicates are the only what creates uniqueness.  
This is the answer of this Continuation to Leibniz, who raised the question of the distinguishability of the indistinguishable: the indistinguishable becomes unique only after receiving its mass as the second predicate, the massless remains indistinguishable
Russell-Zermelo paradox. 
The Continuation answers Russell's question: Does the set of all contain itself as its element?, giving the proven answer that the "set of all" contains several (probably four and more) qualities of point, which all have different sets of predicates. For example, for the "barber paradox": 
Let a barber live in a certain village who shaves all the villagers who do not shave themselves, and only them. 
Does the barber shave itself? 
the solution lies in the fact that the barber ceases to exist for a while, and having shaved himself — into… oblivion? — he returns back and begins to shave everyone, being shaved himself; whereas for Russell and Zermelo the barber does not cease to be.
The Law of Nature. 
The Law of Nature is a transformed ergodic Poincaré Reccurence Theorem: the essence of the Theorem is that certain dynamical systems will, after a sufficiently long but finite time, return to a state arbitrarily close to, or exactly the same as their initial state. Therefore, the Law of Nature, in the absence of distance, ether and vacuum, geometry and symmetry, goes like this: 
— In a given molar volume there is always only this number of photons.
This Law is proved by the existence of the periodic table of chemical elements, where each atom always has a fixed number of parts, and any part always returns back, to its place or doesn't leave it no matter what. For example, numerous attempts to move or remove an electron, by shifting atoms to a plasma-state in order to obtain a "thermonuclear reaction", have failed because the electron doesn‘t go anywhere and/or always comes back. 
Astronomical observations (also experiments) confirm this Law: the orbits of the planets remain stable.
Postulates. 
The Postulate 1, as Einstein's principle of relativity, says: 
- The laws of nature are the same in all coordinate systems, moving in a straight line and uniformly relative to each other. 
In the theory presented the Law mentioned in passing by Einstein is concretized and becomes monotheistic, became the Postulate I: 
- The number of elements in a given molar volume is constant.   
Postulate II of the Continuation:
- The time of inclusion of a photon in any set is the minimum possible. 
Where Einstein in his Postulate 2, about the principle of the speed of light, said the same thing, but from a different perspective: 
- The speed of light in a vacuum is the same in all coordinate systems, moving in a straight line and uniformly relative to each other. 
Indeed, if the speed of movement is maximum, then the time of interaction with anything is minimal, where time in the presented theory is measured in standard units: hours, minutes, etc. 
Time standard. 
There is an absolute standard of time, the time of inclusion of a photon in any object. For example, seeing the light emitted by a flashlight, a person makes the photons part of his eye, interacts. 
The presence of this standard time leads to the absence of the need to synchronize many clocks: in any experiment one clock for two parts of one object or/and subject is enough. 
Other standards. 
There is no need for a standard of space. For example, in a standard meter. 
Geometry. 
The rejection of geometry, in the Continuation, occurs for a purely formal reason: there is no one, literally not a single material point through which it is possible to draw a straight line or build at least one plane. Thus David Gross lost his bet when he said: "I bet that supersymmetry will be discovered”. 
The Axiom. 
The only Axiom of the Contination: 
— There are always, or can be obtained, two parts of any object or subject. 
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #493 : 05 Сентябрь 2023, 22:33:24 »
Force. 
A formula for the force of interaction is obtained, through the alteration of the formulas of Newton for gravity, Coulomb and Ampere on accumulation, from material points. Also, the movement is replaced by harmonic functions: 

m1 and l1 are one molar mass and volume,
m2 and l 2 are the second molar mass and volume,
dm and dl are the increments of these molar masses and volumes,
the ratio of M and L are a constant, which characterizes the number of all other objects and subjects in the universe,  
F is the force of interaction,  
t is time, 
the natural number 0 signifies the beginning and end, that is the moment when the increments cease to exist/ the "collapse" of the function occurs, when the increments come back,  
tr is one of the trigonometric functions cos, sin, sec and cosec. 
The formula basically says that there is a tendency to a state where there is no increments dl or dm, when the force of interaction disappears and the entire right side of the formula is equal to 0, and therefore a new beginning begins.
The number of variation is so big due to the density layers and trigonometrical functions.
Practice.
After this force of interaction is calculated, the number is gotten, a transition is made to the common classical mechanics, to three-dimensional space and time, to Minkowski space: the centers of the two parts of one body are connected by a chord with the cut ends, a vector, directed from one part to another, is constructed. For example, the vector for the Earth, when interacting with the Moon, is built along the chord connecting their centers. 
The problem of three or more bodies. 
In the Continuation there is no problem of two, three, or more objects and subjects, since there is only one body. 
Density layer. 
From the formula follows the presence of layers of density, as more or less strictly limited, within the margin of error, molar volume and mass; where each layer in a certain volume has a strictly defined number of photons in itself. For example, the orbit of an electron in an atom is a layer of density, as is a planetary orbit. 
But if the molar characteristics are in “short supply” — for example, there are not enough photons or volume — then the accumulation point is not formed. For example, a person or a tree does not have layers of density, as well as meteorites and comets, or cars, as molecules do not, because they do not have the right number of photons for their molar volumes. 
1. The density of a body is calculated as the ratio of either molar mass to volume, or molar volume to mass, which follows from the fact that gasses and metals exist in the periodic table for chemical elements: for gases density is the ratio of their molar mass to volume, and for metals vice versa. 
2. The number of elements in the density layers depends on the orisphere radius to the center, which, for example, is proved by the difference in pressure at a depth of 10 km, at sea level and altitude of 10 km.  
The Hafele-Keating experiment.  
The Hafele-Keating experiment unequivocally proves both the existence of density layers and the presence of a strictly defined number of elements in each. For instance, atomic clocks at an altitude of 10 km become, at a purely hardware level, different by its number of photons from what it was at sea level, which is obvious from the indication of different times at different altitudes. The same happens with GPS watches: there is no acceleration or deceleration of time, but there is a change at the number of photons. 
Perihelion of Mercury. 
Another proof of density layers is the presence of perihelion at Mercury: when the number of elements, in the molar volume of Mercury or its mass, exceeds the conditioned one, since particles are obtained from the solar wind and photons from the Sun, then Mercury changes its orbit to get rid of the excess by emitting it. After the surplus is gone, Mercury receives a conditioned ratio of molar characteristics back and returns to the old orbit. Thus its orbit is stable un some sense.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #494 : 05 Сентябрь 2023, 22:34:04 »
Laser.
The existence of a laser is another proof of this Continuation: when excited, atoms give coherent photons, which is proof that there are only so many photons in atoms.
The corona of the Sun and the Earth clouds.
The corona of the Sun and the clouds of the Earth are another proof of the existence of density layers. After all, there is no other way to explain why such massive, millions, billions and trillions of tons, formations hover over the star and the planet!
Ether and vacuum. 
Ether, as a medium, does not exist, at least in the quantitative sense, as well as a vacuum: a number cannot be assigned.
Copenhagen interpretation. 
The Copenhagen Interpretation refers to quantum objects and classical measuring instruments. But in the theory under consideration:
1. There is no distinction between quantum and non-quantum objects, because particles, people and stars are all one quantatively.
2. There are no measuring instruments, since any such device is one of two interacting parts.  
And besides, there is not a word about Avogadro's number, from a pure formal point of view! No quantity in Copenhagen, only quality that is always subjective and cannot be substitute by a number. For instance even the standard of length is not precise and chosen arbitrarily.
An outside observer does not and cannot exist, since one is a third body as well. Therefore, the Copenhagen interpretation is invalid. 
Wave function and Schrödinger equations. 
There is no wave function, since there is no distance, space and medium, and therefore there is no finding a particle in a "place".
Schrödinger's equations are meaningless for the same exactly reason. 
Spin. 
As follows from the formula for the force of interaction - the increment and change of molar characteristics is continuous, until the trigonometric functions reach their limit. Which finds its expression in the spins at all accumulation points. However, a human does not have a spin. 
The limit. 
The natural numbers 0 and 1 are the limits in the Continuation, as the only two Natural numbers. Moreover, 0 is equal to 1, as the beginning is the same as the end; as can be seen from the graphs of the trigonometric functions cos, sin, cosec and cosin. 
Newton's laws rewritten into molar quantities. 
The First Law: 
— There is a material and a continued material point. 
There is a speculation that a material point of the first kind has its one-dimensional space, whilst the second kind has its two-dimensional space. The idea looks nice and believable, although it cannot be verified.
Second Law: 
— Becoming a point of accumulation, the material point acquires molar mass and volume. 
Newton's Third Law: 
— The point of accumulation tends to get rid of its molar characteristics and return to the state of the material point of the second kind. 
Electricity and magnetism. 
Electricity and magnetism are a manifestation of the body's becoming a material point. Since the defect of the body can be both the lack of molar volume and mass, the restoration of volume is electric, masses are magnetic properties; while magnetic can be electric, and vice versa. 
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #495 : 05 Сентябрь 2023, 22:34:37 »
Maxwell's equations rewritten for molar quantities. 
1) The law for the increment of the molar volume: the increment of the molar volume leads to the emergence of the force of interaction, manifested as electricity D. 
2) The law for the increment of the molar mass: the increment of the molar mass leads to the emergence of the force of interaction, manifested as magnetism B. 
3) The law of the transition of the increment of the molar mass to the increment of the molar volume: the increment of one leads to the increment of the other E. 
4) The law of transition of the increment of the molar volume to the increment of the molar mass: the increment of one leads to the increment of the other H. 
Entropy. 
Entropy, as a disappearance from the Universe, does not exist, in some sense: material points of the second kind come to our Universe as photons, leave it, not leaving it ever. Farther, the transition of the fourth kind to the points of accumulation along the center of the orispheres… happens. Indeed, atoms, planets and stars exist for billions of years, while they do not have enough substance for the mythical thermonuclear fusion. Do orispheres feed up, get energy from the fourth kind of points? Seems so.
Conclusion. 
Firstly, a photon is a particle without any wave properties. 
Secondly, physical objects do not have any wave properties as well: what was taken as a wave is actually the restoration of the number of elements (molar mass), or the molar volume. 
Thirdly, the Copenhagen interpretation and quantum physics cease to exist. 
Fourth, there are likely to be numerous kinds of points with unknown properties. Thus there is
1. A hope for a new and, perhaps, environmentally friendly source of energy, 
2. And to go out into… nobody knows where.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #496 : 09 Сентябрь 2023, 03:08:19 »
Ether and vacuum. 
Ether, as a medium, does not exist, in a quantitative sense, just like there is no vacuum: a number cannot be assigned.
Copenhagen interpretation. 
The Copenhagen interpretation discusses the relationship between quantum objects and classical measuring instruments, in the presence of wave-particle dualism concept (the last is caused by the wrong interpretation of double-slit experiment and the phenomenon of interference). However, in the Continuation:
1. There is no dualism in the double-slit because photon is a particle, and the interference is a product of the slits edges.
2. There is no difference between quantum and non-quantum objects, because particles, people and stars are quantitively the same.
3. There are no measuring instruments, since any such device is one of two interacting parts.
The Copenhagen interpretation is wrong.
Wave function and Schrödinger equations. 
There is no wave function, since there is no distance between, space and medium, and therefore there is no a "place".
Schrödinger's equations are meaningless for the same exactly reason. 
Schrödinger's cat.
Schrödinger's cat cannot be isolated from the outside world because only nothing can be, and everything that happens can be detected and observed. Therefore, there can be not a hint of superposition.
Lorentz transformations, force and groups.
There is no distance between, there is no Lorenz.
Spin. 
As follows from the formula for the force of interaction - the increment and change of molar characteristics is continuous, until the trigonometric functions reach their limit. Which finds its expression in the spins, for instance, of electrons. However, humans, molecules and trees  do not have spins.
Double-slit.
Double-slit experiment proves that being affected by light (Einstein's photoelectric effect), atoms receive their defects (increments of their molar characteristics), which the phenomenon leads to the appearance of the above-mentioned force: each atom captures a photon flying past. The caught photon is included, for example, into an atom’s electron, which initiates the emission of an almost coherent photon, in an attempt to preserve and maintain the required number and condition.  
Since these electrons have spins, the emission does not occur immediately but with a time delay, which is seen as interference fringes.
Plank constant.
There is no energy and frequency in the Continuation, the Plank constant has no place in it.
The limit. 
The natural numbers 0 and 1 are the limits in the Continuation, for the trigonometrical functions, as the only two Natural numbers. Moreover, 0 is equal to 1, as the beginning coincides with the end; that can be seen from the graphs of the trigonometric functions cos, sin, cosec and sec. 
Newton's laws rewritten into molar quantities. 
The First Law: 
— There is a material and a continued material point. 
Second Law: 
— Becoming a point of accumulation, the material point acquires its molar mass and volume. 
Newton's Third Law: 
— The point of accumulation tends to get rid of its molar characteristics and return to the stationary state of the material point. 
Electricity and magnetism. 
Electricity and magnetism are manifestations of the body's getting its stationary state. Since the defect of the body can be both the lack of molar volume and mass, the restoration of volume is electric, masses are magnetic properties; while magnetic can be electric, and vice versa. 
Maxwell's equations rewritten for molar quantities. 
1) The law for the increment of the molar volume: the increment of the molar volume leads to the emergence of the force of interaction, manifested as electricity D. 
2) The law for the increment of the molar mass: the increment of the molar mass leads to the emergence of the force of interaction, manifested as magnetism B. 
3) The law of the transition of the increment of the molar mass to the increment of the molar volume: the increment of one leads to the increment of the other E. 
4) The law of transition of the increment of the molar volume to the increment of the molar mass: the increment of one leads to the increment of the other H. 
Entropy. 
Material points come and go from our Universe, as photons: the transition of the forth, after accumulation, kind to our Universe, along the center of the orisphere, seems to happen too. Indeed, atoms, planets and stars exist for billions of years, while they do not have enough substance for the thermonuclear fusion. Do orispheres feed up, get energy from the fourth kind of points?
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #497 : 25 Октябрь 2023, 02:19:08 »
Вот эту тему ОСТ ещё не перенёс.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Оффлайн Ilya Geller

  • _
  • Местный мудрец
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 11778
  • Страна: us
  • Рейтинг: +44/-45
  • Но я всёж-таки был наверху
Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #498 : 25 Октябрь 2023, 02:20:30 »
Спецом для ОСТ повторяю: квантовая физика кирдык, всё что знал и умел ОСТ устарело.
Но я всёж-таки был наверху
И меня не спихнуть с высоты!

Большой Форум

Re: Уравнения Максвелла в топку!
« Ответ #498 : 25 Октябрь 2023, 02:20:30 »
Loading...